Consistent deficit spending, with expenses exceeding revenue in all reported periods.
Declining asset base over the past decade, from $2.26M in 2014 to $1.74M in 2023.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds at the leadership level.
Long and consistent filing history (13 filings), demonstrating transparency and stable operations.
Clear mission focus on Housing for the Elderly (NTEE L22).
Spending Breakdown
How Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc
Is Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc (EIN: 202370922) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc a good charity to donate to?
Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $135K. Assets: $1.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc is 202370922. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc spend its money?
Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202370922 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Dixieland Garden Senior Complex Inc. appears to be a well-established organization with a long filing history, indicating consistent operation. However, a significant concern is the consistent deficit spending, where expenses have exceeded revenue in every reported period. For example, in 2023, expenses were $193,771 against revenues of $121,603, resulting in a deficit of over $72,000. This trend has led to a gradual decline in assets over the years, from $2,260,220 in 2014 to $1,739,834 in 2023. While the organization maintains substantial assets relative to its annual revenue, this pattern of drawing down reserves is unsustainable long-term without an increase in revenue or a reduction in expenses.
The organization's transparency is bolstered by its consistent IRS 990 filings over 13 periods. The absence of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean administrative structure, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The NTEE code L22 (Housing for the Elderly) indicates a clear program focus, but the financial sustainability is a key area for improvement.