Quick charity verification for Dodge Scholarship For Girls (EIN: 20439653)
Verdict: Dodge Scholarship For Girls appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$215KRevenue
$355KAssets
3Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent deficit spending, with expenses exceeding revenue in most years (e.g., $31,308 expenses vs. $24,046 revenue in 2023).
Declining asset base over the past decade, from $352,290 in 2011 to $243,128 in 2023, indicating reliance on reserves.
Unexplained, significant revenue spike in the latest period ($215,378) compared to historical norms, which could be a one-time event rather than sustainable growth.
Strengths
Zero officer compensation reported across all filings, indicating efficient use of funds for the mission.
Long operating history (at least since 2011) demonstrates organizational stability and commitment to its mission.
Clear mission focused on scholarships for girls.
Spending Breakdown
How Dodge Scholarship For Girls allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Dodge Scholarship For Girls
Is Dodge Scholarship For Girls a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Dodge Scholarship For Girls (EIN: 20439653) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Dodge Scholarship For Girls a good charity to donate to?
Dodge Scholarship For Girls has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $215K. Assets: $355K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Dodge Scholarship For Girls?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Dodge Scholarship For Girls is 20439653. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Dodge Scholarship For Girls spend its money?
Dodge Scholarship For Girls allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Dodge Scholarship For Girls's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Dodge Scholarship For Girls's tax-exempt status using EIN 20439653 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Dodge Scholarship For Girls appears to be a small, well-established organization focused on providing scholarships. Its financial health shows a consistent pattern of expenses exceeding revenue in most recent years, leading to a gradual decline in assets from $352,290 in 2011 to $243,128 in 2023. While the latest reported revenue is $215,378, this figure is an outlier compared to its historical annual revenues, which typically range from $10,000 to $37,000. This discrepancy warrants further investigation to understand the source of this significant revenue spike and its impact on the organization's long-term sustainability. The organization consistently reports minimal liabilities ($1), indicating a low debt burden.
The spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent deficit spending suggests that the organization is drawing down its endowment or reserves to cover operational costs. The absence of officer compensation is a positive indicator for donor confidence, suggesting that resources are not being diverted to high executive salaries. Transparency is generally good given the availability of 990 filings, but a more granular breakdown of expenses would enhance understanding of how funds are allocated.
Overall, while the organization has a long history and a clear mission, its reliance on asset drawdowns to cover expenses, as evidenced by the declining asset base and consistent expense-to-revenue ratios (e.g., $31,308 expenses vs. $24,046 revenue in 2023), raises questions about its long-term financial model. The recent large revenue figure could be a positive turning point if it represents a sustainable new funding source, but without context, it's an anomaly.