Quick charity verification for Double F Foundation (EIN: 202751477)
Verdict: Double F Foundation has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential inactivity or cessation of operations.
Consistent history of expenses significantly exceeding revenue, raising questions about financial sustainability (e.g., 201209: $9,456 revenue vs. $279,324 expenses).
Lack of detailed financial information beyond basic revenue/expense/asset figures makes in-depth analysis of program efficiency challenging.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds for administrative costs.
Regular filing of IRS Form 990, demonstrating compliance with transparency requirements.
Spending Breakdown
How Double F Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Double F Foundation
Is Double F Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Double F Foundation (EIN: 202751477) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Double F Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Double F Foundation has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Double F Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Double F Foundation is 202751477. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Double F Foundation spend its money?
Double F Foundation allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Double F Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Double F Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 202751477 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Double F Foundation appears to be a very small organization, with its latest reported revenue and assets both at $0. This suggests it may be inactive or in the process of winding down. Historically, the foundation has operated with minimal revenue, often incurring expenses significantly higher than its income, such as in 201209 when it reported $9,456 in revenue against $279,324 in expenses. This consistent deficit spending, without substantial incoming funds, raises questions about its long-term financial viability and funding model. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings indicates that leadership may be volunteer-based, which can be a positive for efficiency, but the overall financial picture is one of an organization struggling to maintain operations or with a very specific, limited purpose that doesn't involve significant financial transactions.
Given the $0 revenue and assets in the latest filing, it's difficult to assess current spending efficiency or program focus. In prior years, the substantial difference between expenses and revenue suggests that the organization was either drawing down on prior assets or receiving non-cash contributions not fully reflected in the revenue figures, or operating at a significant loss. The consistent reporting of $1 in liabilities in several years (201309, 201409, 201509) is unusual and could indicate a nominal placeholder or a very specific, minor outstanding obligation. Without more detailed breakdowns of expenses, it's challenging to determine the allocation between programs, administration, and fundraising, especially given the low revenue figures.
Transparency is generally good in terms of filing the required IRS 990 forms, but the financial data itself presents a picture of an organization with very limited financial activity, particularly in its most recent reporting period. The absence of significant financial transactions makes a detailed analysis of financial health and spending efficiency challenging. The consistent zero officer compensation is a positive indicator of resource allocation, assuming the organization was actively pursuing its mission during those periods.