NTEE code is unknown, making it difficult to ascertain the specific mission area.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported, indicating a volunteer-led or very lean administrative structure.
Consistent filing of IRS Form 990s in previous years, demonstrating historical transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation
Is Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation (EIN: 201210598) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation is 201210598. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation spend its money?
Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 201210598 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Doyle & Donna Shepherd Foundation appears to be a small, private foundation based on its consistent revenue and expense levels, typically around $100,000-$190,000 annually. A significant concern is the reported $0 in latest revenue and assets, which, when combined with the historical data, suggests the foundation may no longer be actively operating or has significantly scaled down. Historically, the foundation's expenses have often exceeded its revenue, as seen in 2013 ($190,163 expenses vs. $184,507 revenue) and 2012 ($129,374 expenses vs. $120,012 revenue), indicating a reliance on prior year assets or other funding sources to cover operational costs. The lack of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean administrative structure, which can be a positive for efficiency, but the overall financial health is questionable given the current $0 status.
Without detailed breakdowns of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. However, the consistent reporting of assets and liabilities in previous years, albeit small, indicates some level of financial management. The current $0 revenue and assets, if accurate for the latest period, raises significant questions about its ongoing viability and mission fulfillment. Transparency is moderate; while 990 filings are available, the absence of an NTEE code and the current financial state make it difficult to fully understand its purpose and impact.