Quick charity verification for Drunken Boat (EIN: 113590909)
Verdict: Drunken Boat shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of recent financial filings (last filing from 2011)
Reported $0 revenue and assets for the 'latest' period, suggesting inactivity or cessation of operations
Strengths
No officer compensation reported in 2011 filing
No liabilities reported in 2011 filing
Spending Breakdown
How Drunken Boat allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Drunken Boat
Is Drunken Boat a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Drunken Boat (EIN: 113590909) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Drunken Boat a good charity to donate to?
Drunken Boat has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Drunken Boat?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Drunken Boat is 113590909. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Drunken Boat spend its money?
Drunken Boat allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Drunken Boat's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Drunken Boat's tax-exempt status using EIN 113590909 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Drunken Boat appears to be a very small, likely volunteer-run organization, given its reported revenue and asset figures. In its most recent filing (2011), it reported $2,250 in revenue and $2,850 in expenses, resulting in a slight deficit for that period. Its assets were $2,650 with no liabilities, indicating a stable but minimal financial base. The organization reported no officer compensation, which is a positive sign for a small nonprofit and suggests resources are not being diverted to high executive salaries. However, the lack of more recent financial data (the latest filing is from 2011) makes a current assessment of its financial health and ongoing operations difficult. Without more up-to-date information, it's challenging to fully evaluate its current spending efficiency or transparency beyond the single available filing.