Is Economic History Association Legit? —…

Quick charity verification for Economic History Association (EIN: 136128711)

Spending Breakdown

How Economic History Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Economic History Association

Is Economic History Association a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Economic History Association (EIN: 136128711) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Economic History Association a good charity to donate to?

Economic History Association has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $469K. Assets: $4.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Economic History Association?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Economic History Association is 136128711. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Economic History Association spend its money?

Economic History Association allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Economic History Association's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Economic History Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 136128711 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Economic History Association demonstrates consistent financial stability with a healthy asset base. In the latest filing (202307), the organization reported revenues of $570,277 against expenses of $505,655, indicating a surplus. Their assets have grown significantly over the past decade, from $2,004,360 in 2014 to $3,769,802 in 2023, suggesting sound financial management and accumulation of reserves. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of transparency and a focus on mission-related spending rather than executive enrichment.

While specific program, administrative, and fundraising expense breakdowns are not provided in the summary data, the overall financial health appears robust. The consistent surplus in most years, coupled with substantial assets relative to annual revenue, provides a strong buffer for future operations. The absence of officer compensation is a notable positive for transparency and donor confidence.

However, without detailed expense breakdowns from the 990s, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency across program, administrative, and fundraising categories. The organization's consistent financial performance and growth in assets, alongside zero officer compensation, generally point towards a well-managed and transparent entity.

Is Economic History Association Legit?

Verdict: Economic History Association appears trustworthy

Red Flags

Strengths