Consistent deficit spending (e.g., $456,555 expenses vs. $346,263 revenue in 2016)
Liabilities frequently exceed assets (e.g., $104,254 liabilities vs. $36,250 assets in 2016)
Significant fluctuation in revenue and expenses year-over-year, indicating potential instability
Lack of detailed spending breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided summary data
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, potentially indicating low executive overhead or volunteer leadership
Long operating history with 6 filings, suggesting sustained effort in its mission
Spending Breakdown
How Empowerment Clinic Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Empowerment Clinic Inc
Is Empowerment Clinic Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Empowerment Clinic Inc (EIN: 208882205) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Empowerment Clinic Inc a good charity to donate to?
Empowerment Clinic Inc has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $346K. Assets: $36K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Empowerment Clinic Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Empowerment Clinic Inc is 208882205. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Empowerment Clinic Inc spend its money?
Empowerment Clinic Inc allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Empowerment Clinic Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Empowerment Clinic Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 208882205 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Empowerment Clinic Inc. demonstrates a mixed financial picture based on its IRS 990 filings. While the organization has shown significant revenue fluctuations over the years, with a peak of $352,629 in 2012 and $346,263 in 2016, it has also frequently operated with expenses exceeding revenue, notably in 2016 where expenses of $456,555 outstripped revenue by over $110,000. This consistent deficit spending, coupled with liabilities often exceeding assets (e.g., $104,254 liabilities vs. $36,250 assets in 2016), suggests potential financial instability and reliance on future funding or reserves that may not be robust.
The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent lack of reported officer compensation across all filings is a positive indicator of potentially lower administrative overhead, assuming key leadership roles are either volunteer or compensated through other means not captured as 'officer compensation'. The significant increase in liabilities in 2016 warrants further investigation to understand its nature and impact on long-term sustainability. Transparency regarding the use of funds beyond the high-level revenue and expense figures would greatly enhance understanding of its operational efficiency and impact.