Lack of detailed spending breakdown (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in provided data
Inconsistent revenue generation leading to periods of deficit spending (e.g., 2013 and 2011)
Strengths
No reported officer compensation across all filings, indicating high efficiency in this area
Growth in assets over the reporting period, from $370,076 in 2011 to $558,142 in 2014
Reduction in liabilities over the reporting period, from $219,922 in 2011 to $176,599 in 2014
Spending Breakdown
How Environment Maryland Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Environment Maryland Inc
Is Environment Maryland Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Environment Maryland Inc (EIN: 204690041) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Environment Maryland Inc a good charity to donate to?
Environment Maryland Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Environment Maryland Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Environment Maryland Inc is 204690041. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Environment Maryland Inc spend its money?
Environment Maryland Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Environment Maryland Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Environment Maryland Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 204690041 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Environment Maryland Inc. demonstrates a consistent operational history with fluctuating but generally positive financial health across its reported filings. For example, in 2014, the organization reported revenues of $429,075 against expenses of $335,798, indicating a surplus. However, in 2013 and 2011, expenses exceeded revenues, suggesting periods of deficit spending. The organization's assets have shown growth, reaching $558,142 in 2014, while liabilities have been managed, decreasing from $219,922 in 2011 to $176,599 in 2014. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead in this area, which is a positive indicator for transparency and efficiency. The lack of specific program spending breakdowns in the provided data makes a detailed assessment of spending efficiency challenging beyond the executive compensation aspect.