Significant volatility in assets year-over-year, indicating potential instability in financial reserves.
Increase in liabilities from $613 in 202212 to $227,117 in 202312, which could signal growing financial obligations.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating strong transparency and a commitment to directing funds to the mission.
Substantial revenue generation, with latest revenue at $4,225,018, demonstrating significant donor support.
Long filing history (12 filings), suggesting established operations and compliance with IRS reporting.
Spending Breakdown
How Envision Excellence In Stemeducation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Envision Excellence In Stemeducation
Is Envision Excellence In Stemeducation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Envision Excellence In Stemeducation (EIN: 208622102) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Envision Excellence In Stemeducation a good charity to donate to?
Envision Excellence In Stemeducation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $4.2M. Assets: $583K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Envision Excellence In Stemeducation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Envision Excellence In Stemeducation is 208622102. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Envision Excellence In Stemeducation spend its money?
Envision Excellence In Stemeducation allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Envision Excellence In Stemeducation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Envision Excellence In Stemeducation's tax-exempt status using EIN 208622102 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Envision Excellence In Stemeducation demonstrates a fluctuating financial health over the past several years. While the organization reported $4,225,018 in latest revenue, its expenses have often exceeded revenue, as seen in 202312 (expenses of $3,727,508 against revenue of $3,722,143) and 202212 (expenses of $2,193,125 against revenue of $1,686,671). This trend suggests a need for careful management of expenditures relative to incoming funds to ensure long-term sustainability. The organization's assets have also shown significant variability, from a high of $1,800,580 in 201812 to a low of $153,674 in 202212, currently standing at $583,253. This volatility in assets and occasional operating deficits could indicate challenges in building robust financial reserves.
The organization's spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings is a strong indicator of transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards the mission rather than executive salaries. This practice is commendable and suggests a lean operational structure at the leadership level. The absence of officer compensation also implies that the organization's leadership may be volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which would be a positive sign for donor confidence.
Overall, while the organization exhibits strong transparency regarding executive compensation, its financial stability could benefit from more consistent revenue generation relative to expenses and a clearer trend in asset growth. The significant swings in revenue and expenses year-over-year warrant closer examination to understand the underlying operational dynamics and ensure efficient resource allocation. The lack of detailed spending breakdowns for programs, administration, and fundraising in the provided data limits a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency beyond the executive compensation aspect.