Unknown NTEE code makes programmatic assessment difficult
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential inactivity or reporting issue
Lack of detailed expense breakdown prevents analysis of spending efficiency
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation
Low liabilities across most reporting periods
Stable asset base over several years (prior to latest filing)
Spending Breakdown
How Epsilon Holding Corporation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Epsilon Holding Corporation
Is Epsilon Holding Corporation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Epsilon Holding Corporation (EIN: 20266165) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Epsilon Holding Corporation a good charity to donate to?
Epsilon Holding Corporation has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Epsilon Holding Corporation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Epsilon Holding Corporation is 20266165. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Epsilon Holding Corporation spend its money?
Epsilon Holding Corporation allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Epsilon Holding Corporation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Epsilon Holding Corporation's tax-exempt status using EIN 20266165 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Epsilon Holding Corporation appears to be a holding company with minimal operational activity, as indicated by its consistently low revenue and expenses across all reported periods. The organization's assets have remained relatively stable, hovering around the half-million dollar mark, while liabilities have been negligible or non-existent in most years, with a peak of $12,461 in 2016. The most recent filing shows zero revenue and assets, which could indicate a change in reporting status or a period of complete inactivity. Given the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency beyond the overall low expenditure levels. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation suggests a volunteer-led or minimally compensated leadership structure, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence. However, the absence of an NTEE code and the nature of its 'holding corporation' designation make it difficult to ascertain its specific programmatic focus or impact.