How Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A
Is Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A (EIN: 136096739) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 4 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A a good charity to donate to?
Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $5.1M. Assets: $15.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A is 136096739. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A spend its money?
Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A's tax-exempt status using EIN 136096739 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Erik Thune Tr U D 68470 00 Mellon Bank De N A appears to be a private foundation or trust given its consistent asset base and minimal liabilities. Its financial health shows significant variability in revenue, ranging from a negative revenue of $-218,113 in 2020 to a high of $1,725,872 in 2021, and $1,143,598 in 2023. Despite these fluctuations, its assets have remained remarkably stable, hovering around $15-16 million over the past five years, indicating a strong underlying endowment. The organization consistently reports $1 in liabilities, suggesting a very low financial risk profile. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, total expenses have been relatively consistent, ranging from $773,618 to $935,284 annually. The organization reports 0% officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding executive pay. Transparency is limited by the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data, making it challenging to fully evaluate how funds are allocated beyond total expenses.