Limited financial transparency due to lack of detailed expense breakdown in provided data
Only one IRS 990 filing available, limiting trend analysis
Strengths
Positive net asset position ($27,434 assets vs $6,150 liabilities in 2022)
No reported officer compensation (0% in 2022 filing)
Operates within its means, showing a surplus in 2022 ($78,255 revenue vs $71,790 expenses)
Spending Breakdown
How Esther Productions Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Esther Productions Inc
Is Esther Productions Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Esther Productions Inc (EIN: 202125266) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Esther Productions Inc a good charity to donate to?
Esther Productions Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $53K. Assets: $23K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Esther Productions Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Esther Productions Inc is 202125266. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Esther Productions Inc spend its money?
Esther Productions Inc allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Esther Productions Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Esther Productions Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202125266 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Esther Productions Inc, with a single IRS 990 filing in 2022, shows a relatively small operational scale. In 2022, the organization reported revenues of $78,255 and expenses of $71,790, indicating a modest surplus for the year. Its assets stood at $27,434 against liabilities of $6,150, suggesting a healthy asset-to-liability ratio. The organization's financial health appears stable for its size, maintaining a positive net asset position.
The spending efficiency cannot be fully determined without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the absence of reported officer compensation (0%) suggests that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which can be a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding executive pay. Transparency is moderate, with one filing available, but more detailed expense breakdowns would enhance understanding of spending efficiency.
Overall, Esther Productions Inc appears to be a small, fiscally responsible organization based on the available data, operating within its means and maintaining a positive financial standing. Further detailed expense information would be beneficial for a more comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency.