Quick charity verification for Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville (EIN: 201724061)
Verdict: Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$2.6MRevenue
$2.3MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent 0% officer compensation reported, which is highly unusual for an organization of this size and revenue, potentially indicating a lack of transparency in executive remuneration reporting.
Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data, making precise spending efficiency analysis difficult.
Strengths
Strong and consistent revenue growth over the past decade, from $399,158 in 2014 to $3,985,798 in 2023.
Significant asset accumulation, reaching $4,873,288 in 2023, indicating good financial management and capacity.
Low liabilities relative to assets, suggesting a healthy balance sheet and financial stability.
Expenses generally remain below revenue, allowing for consistent asset growth.
Spending Breakdown
How Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville
Is Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville (EIN: 201724061) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville a good charity to donate to?
Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $2.6M. Assets: $2.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville is 201724061. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville spend its money?
Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville's tax-exempt status using EIN 201724061 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Faces And Voices Of Recovery Greenville demonstrates a generally healthy financial trajectory, marked by consistent revenue growth over the past decade, from $399,158 in 2014 to $3,985,798 in 2023. The organization has also built substantial assets, reaching $4,873,288 in 2023, indicating good financial stewardship and capacity. While expenses have also increased, they generally remain below revenue, allowing for asset accumulation. The organization's liabilities are consistently low relative to its assets, suggesting a strong balance sheet.
Spending efficiency appears strong, particularly given the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which is highly unusual and suggests either a fully volunteer-led executive team or compensation being reported under different categories. This lack of reported officer compensation, while potentially positive for direct program spending, could also be a point for further inquiry regarding transparency in executive remuneration. Without detailed functional expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising), a precise efficiency assessment is challenging, but the overall financial growth and asset accumulation are positive indicators.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is a notable area. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings is highly unusual for an organization of this size and revenue. While this could indicate a unique operational model, it warrants further investigation to understand how leadership is compensated, if at all, and whether these costs are embedded in other expense categories. This specific detail impacts the overall transparency assessment.