Quick charity verification for Farmington Health Services (EIN: 200100365)
Verdict: Farmington Health Services shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$14.1MRevenue
$30.8MAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operational deficits (expenses exceeding revenue in most recent years)
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided data
Strengths
Significant growth in assets over time, from $11.7M in 2015 to $30.8M currently
No reported officer compensation, indicating low executive overhead
Long filing history (14 filings) suggests consistent compliance
Spending Breakdown
How Farmington Health Services allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Farmington Health Services
Is Farmington Health Services a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Farmington Health Services (EIN: 200100365) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Farmington Health Services a good charity to donate to?
Farmington Health Services has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $14.1M. Assets: $30.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Farmington Health Services?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Farmington Health Services is 200100365. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Farmington Health Services spend its money?
Farmington Health Services allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Farmington Health Services's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Farmington Health Services's tax-exempt status using EIN 200100365 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Farmington Health Services demonstrates consistent operational deficits over the past several years, with expenses frequently exceeding revenue. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $13,491,283 against revenues of $13,202,799, and similar trends are visible in 2022, 2021, and 2020. This indicates a reliance on existing assets or other funding sources to cover operational costs, which could be a long-term sustainability concern if not addressed. The organization's assets have shown growth over the long term, from $11,718,389 in 2015 to $30,840,062 currently, suggesting some financial stability despite the operational deficits.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data, it's challenging to fully assess. However, the consistent operational losses suggest that the current revenue streams are not sufficient to cover all expenditures. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a notable point regarding transparency, indicating either a volunteer leadership structure or that compensation is reported differently or below a disclosure threshold. This lack of detail makes it difficult to fully evaluate executive compensation practices.
Overall, while the organization has grown its asset base, the recurring operational deficits warrant closer examination. Transparency regarding the allocation of expenses (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) would significantly enhance the ability to assess spending efficiency and overall financial health. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a positive sign for minimizing overhead in that area, but further clarity on overall spending is needed.