No reported liabilities across all available filing periods, suggesting good debt management.
Spending Breakdown
How Fhg Armstrong Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Fhg Armstrong Foundation
Is Fhg Armstrong Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Fhg Armstrong Foundation (EIN: 205281744) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 35/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Fhg Armstrong Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Fhg Armstrong Foundation has a Mission Score of 35/100. Revenue: $1. Assets: $69K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Fhg Armstrong Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Fhg Armstrong Foundation is 205281744. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Fhg Armstrong Foundation spend its money?
Fhg Armstrong Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Fhg Armstrong Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Fhg Armstrong Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205281744 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Fhg Armstrong Foundation exhibits a concerning financial trend, with its latest reported revenue at a mere $1, a drastic decline from previous years where revenue reached hundreds of thousands. This significant drop in income, coupled with a history of expenses frequently exceeding revenue (e.g., $373,294 in expenses against $20,000 revenue in 2015), raises serious questions about its long-term sustainability and operational viability. While the organization has maintained assets, they have also seen a substantial decrease from a peak of $470,106 in 2012 to $68,803 currently. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation suggests a volunteer-driven or very lean executive structure, which can be a positive for efficiency, but the overall financial picture is one of significant contraction and potential instability.
Given the available data, it's difficult to fully assess spending efficiency without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses. However, the consistent pattern of expenses often outstripping revenue, particularly in recent years, indicates a potential challenge in managing costs relative to income. The lack of reported liabilities is a positive sign, suggesting the organization isn't accumulating debt. Transparency appears adequate in terms of filing IRS 990s, but the dramatic financial shifts warrant closer scrutiny to understand the underlying causes and future plans.