Is Fred Sandback Archive Legit?

Strengths

Strong financial health with significant asset growth to $2,921,414 in 202312
Consistently low liabilities, often $1, indicating minimal debt
Very high spending efficiency, with expenses often a small fraction of revenue (e.g., 2.4% in 202312)
No reported officer compensation, suggesting volunteer leadership or highly efficient compensation practices
Consistent filing history over 10 periods, indicating good compliance

Spending Breakdown

How Fred Sandback Archive allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Fred Sandback Archive

Is Fred Sandback Archive a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Fred Sandback Archive (EIN: 208600128) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.

Is Fred Sandback Archive a good charity to donate to?

Fred Sandback Archive has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $121K. Assets: $2.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Fred Sandback Archive?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Fred Sandback Archive is 208600128. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Fred Sandback Archive spend its money?

Fred Sandback Archive allocates 90% to programs, 8% to administration, and 2% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Fred Sandback Archive's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Fred Sandback Archive's tax-exempt status using EIN 208600128 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Fred Sandback Archive demonstrates strong financial health, particularly in its most recent filing period (202312) where it reported substantial revenue of $2,218,589 against relatively low expenses of $53,728. This resulted in a significant increase in assets to $2,921,414, indicating robust financial growth and capacity. The organization consistently reports minimal liabilities, often just $1, which is a strong indicator of financial stability and low debt burden.

Spending efficiency appears very high, with expenses consistently low across most years relative to revenue, especially in periods of high revenue. For instance, in 202312, expenses were only 2.4% of revenue. The absence of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not classified as officer compensation, which can contribute to lower administrative overhead. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a precise assessment of spending efficiency across these areas is challenging.

Transparency is generally good given the availability of 10 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a transparent practice. However, the NTEE code A50 (Arts, Culture, Humanities - General) is broad, and without more detailed program descriptions in the filings, it's difficult to fully understand the specific programmatic activities and their impact. Further detail on how the significant asset base is being utilized to further the mission would enhance transparency.

Verdict: Fred Sandback Archive appears trustworthy

Red Flags