Consistent IRS 990 filing history demonstrates transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated
Is Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated (EIN: 20498277) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated a good charity to donate to?
Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated is 20498277. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated spend its money?
Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated's tax-exempt status using EIN 20498277 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Friends Of Pillsbury State Park Incorporated appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization with minimal financial activity. The latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, suggesting either dormancy or extremely limited operations. Historically, annual revenues have been consistently low, ranging from $111 to $674, with expenses generally in a similar modest range. The organization consistently reports $0 in liabilities and no officer compensation, indicating a stable, debt-free, and volunteer-driven structure. Given its small scale and lack of significant financial transactions, assessing spending efficiency in traditional terms is challenging, but the absence of liabilities and executive compensation suggests a lean operational model. Transparency is good, with consistent filings available, though the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of program versus administrative spending.