Operating deficit in the most recent fiscal period (202306) where expenses exceeded revenue by over $9.5 million.
Strengths
Stable asset base, consistently above $119 million over the past decade.
Long operating history with 13 filings, indicating established presence.
Healthy asset-to-liability ratio, with assets significantly exceeding liabilities.
Spending Breakdown
How Georgian Court University allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Georgian Court University
Is Georgian Court University a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Georgian Court University (EIN: 210634981) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Georgian Court University a good charity to donate to?
Georgian Court University has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $80.2M. Assets: $122.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Georgian Court University?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Georgian Court University is 210634981. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Georgian Court University spend its money?
Georgian Court University allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Georgian Court University's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Georgian Court University's tax-exempt status using EIN 210634981 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Georgian Court University demonstrates a consistent operational profile over the past decade, with revenues and expenses generally in balance, indicating stable financial management. For the fiscal period ending 202306, the university reported revenues of $58,760,311 against expenses of $68,281,870, resulting in a deficit. This recent trend of expenses exceeding revenue, also observed in 201906, 201806, and 201706, warrants attention, though it's not a consistent pattern across all years. The organization's assets have remained substantial, hovering around $120-130 million, with liabilities consistently around $30-38 million, suggesting a healthy asset-to-liability ratio. The consistent reporting of 0% for officer compensation across all available filings is unusual for an organization of this size and could indicate that compensation is reported differently or not at all in this section, which impacts transparency regarding executive pay.