Consistent operational deficits across all reported periods (e.g., $17,887 deficit in 2024).
Steady decline in total assets over the past decade (from $740,149 in 2011 to $521,151 in 2024).
Strengths
Zero reported officer compensation across all filings, indicating volunteer leadership or highly efficient compensation practices.
Low liabilities relative to assets, suggesting prudent debt management.
Spending Breakdown
How Ghf Residential Services allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ghf Residential Services
Is Ghf Residential Services a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Ghf Residential Services (EIN: 208291517) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Ghf Residential Services a good charity to donate to?
Ghf Residential Services has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $62K. Assets: $504K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Ghf Residential Services?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Ghf Residential Services is 208291517. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Ghf Residential Services spend its money?
Ghf Residential Services allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Ghf Residential Services's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Ghf Residential Services's tax-exempt status using EIN 208291517 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Ghf Residential Services appears to be a small, community-focused organization with a consistent operational deficit over the past decade. In the most recent filing (Period 202406), the organization reported revenue of $54,863 against expenses of $72,750, indicating a deficit of $17,887. This trend of expenses exceeding revenue is visible across all provided filings, suggesting a reliance on existing assets or other non-operating income sources to cover costs. The organization's assets have steadily declined from $740,149 in 2011 to $521,151 in 2024, which is a significant draw-down over time.
The organization demonstrates strong transparency regarding executive compensation, reporting 0% officer compensation across all available filings. This indicates that the leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not classified as officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor confidence. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall deficit.
While the consistent operational deficit and declining asset base are areas of concern for long-term financial sustainability, the lack of officer compensation and relatively low liabilities ($14,380 in 2024) suggest prudent management of debt. Further analysis would require a more granular view of program spending versus administrative and fundraising costs to fully evaluate efficiency and program impact.