Latest assets ($31,665) are extremely low relative to latest revenue ($1,202,788), suggesting minimal financial reserves.
Unusual consistent $1 liability reported across multiple years, which may warrant further investigation.
Strengths
Consistent filing of IRS 990 forms, indicating adherence to reporting requirements.
No reported officer compensation, which could suggest a volunteer-driven leadership, potentially reducing administrative overhead.
Spending Breakdown
How Gies Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Gies Foundation
Is Gies Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Gies Foundation (EIN: 201685394) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 35/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Gies Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Gies Foundation has a Mission Score of 35/100. Revenue: $1.2M. Assets: $32K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Gies Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Gies Foundation is 201685394. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Gies Foundation spend its money?
Gies Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Gies Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Gies Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 201685394 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Gies Foundation exhibits a concerning trend of declining assets and consistent operating deficits over the past several years. While the organization reported $1,202,788 in latest revenue, its expenses have frequently outpaced revenue, as seen in 2023 where revenue was $219,223 against expenses of $998,895, and in 2022 with $58,429 in revenue versus $1,277,481 in expenses. This indicates a reliance on drawing down existing assets or inconsistent funding streams. The significant drop in assets from a peak of $6,608,913 in 2012 to $31,665 currently raises serious questions about long-term sustainability and financial management.
The organization's transparency appears adequate in terms of filing history, with 10 filings available. However, the consistent liabilities of $1 across multiple years, while seemingly low, could indicate an accounting anomaly or a very specific type of liability that remains constant. The absence of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests either a fully volunteer-run leadership or compensation being reported under other expense categories, which would warrant further investigation for clarity on administrative costs. The overall financial health is precarious given the sustained negative net income and asset depletion.