Consistent deficit spending (expenses exceeding revenue) for over a decade.
Significant decline in assets from $11,697 in 2011 to $4,799 in 2023, indicating a draw-down of reserves.
Very low and inconsistent revenue generation, making long-term sustainability questionable.
Strengths
No executive compensation reported, indicating efficient use of funds at the leadership level.
Long operating history with 10 filings, suggesting a committed, albeit financially challenged, presence.
Spending Breakdown
How Glenburn Library Irrv Tr allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Glenburn Library Irrv Tr
Is Glenburn Library Irrv Tr a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Glenburn Library Irrv Tr (EIN: 16157069) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Glenburn Library Irrv Tr a good charity to donate to?
Glenburn Library Irrv Tr has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $3K. Assets: $4K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Glenburn Library Irrv Tr?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Glenburn Library Irrv Tr is 16157069. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Glenburn Library Irrv Tr spend its money?
Glenburn Library Irrv Tr allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Glenburn Library Irrv Tr's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Glenburn Library Irrv Tr's tax-exempt status using EIN 16157069 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Glenburn Library Irrv Tr appears to be a very small organization with limited financial activity. Its revenue has consistently been lower than its expenses for the past several years, leading to a steady decline in assets from $11,697 in 2011 to $4,799 in 2023. This trend suggests the organization is operating at a deficit and drawing down its reserves. Given its small scale, the organization's financial health is precarious, as it is not generating enough income to cover its operational costs.
The provided data does not offer a detailed breakdown of expenses, making it impossible to assess spending efficiency in terms of program, administrative, or fundraising costs. However, the consistent deficit spending is a significant concern. Transparency regarding executive compensation is good, as it consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-led or very low-cost leadership structure. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a full transparency assessment beyond compensation.
Overall, the organization's financial health is weak due to persistent deficit spending and declining assets. While executive compensation is not a concern, the absence of detailed expense breakdowns prevents a thorough evaluation of spending efficiency. The organization's long-term sustainability is questionable without a significant increase in revenue or reduction in expenses.