No reported liabilities, suggesting a debt-free financial position
Spending Breakdown
How Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated
Is Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated (EIN: 201180311) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated a good charity to donate to?
Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $151K. Assets: $1. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated is 201180311. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated spend its money?
Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorportated's tax-exempt status using EIN 201180311 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Grace Holiness Deliverance Church Incorporated demonstrates a unique financial profile. With reported revenues of $150,812 in 2022 and $180,825 in 2021, the organization consistently reports minimal expenses relative to its income, at $34,320 and $34,260 respectively. This results in a significant accumulation of net assets, though the reported total assets remain at a nominal $1 across both periods, which is an unusual discrepancy that warrants further investigation. The organization reports no liabilities, indicating a debt-free status.
The organization's spending efficiency appears very high, with expenses representing a small fraction of revenue. However, the extremely low reported asset value alongside substantial revenue surpluses raises questions about how funds are being managed or categorized. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across both filings suggests a volunteer-led or unpaid leadership structure, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding executive pay. Transparency could be improved by clarifying the discrepancy between revenue surpluses and reported assets.