Quick charity verification for Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr (EIN: 10488464)
Verdict: Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr appears trustworthy
95/100Mission Score
$2.2MRevenue
$8.8MAssets
1Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent 0% officer compensation for an organization of this size could indicate compensation is reported in other categories, or a reliance on unpaid leadership which may not be sustainable long-term.
Strengths
Strong and consistent asset growth, from $5.2M in 2016 to $8.8M currently, indicating financial stability and successful fundraising.
Revenue consistently exceeds expenses, demonstrating efficient financial management and a healthy surplus for mission-related activities (e.g., $1,155,680 revenue vs. $529,144 expenses in 202406).
Zero reported officer compensation across all filings, suggesting a high dedication to mission and efficient use of donor funds.
Excellent filing history with 15 available IRS 990s, indicating strong transparency and accountability.
Low liabilities relative to assets in most recent filings (e.g., $10,557 liabilities vs. $8,667,304 assets in 202406), indicating a healthy balance sheet.
Spending Breakdown
How Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
7%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
3%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr
Is Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr (EIN: 10488464) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 95/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr a good charity to donate to?
Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr has a Mission Score of 95/100. Revenue: $2.2M. Assets: $8.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr is 10488464. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr spend its money?
Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr allocates 90% to programs, 7% to administration, and 3% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Great Pond Mountain Conservation Tr's tax-exempt status using EIN 10488464 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Great Pond Mountain Conservation Trust demonstrates strong financial health and a clear commitment to its mission, as evidenced by its consistent growth in assets and revenue. In the latest filing (202406), the organization reported revenue of $1,155,680 against expenses of $529,144, indicating a healthy surplus that contributes to its asset base, which reached $8,667,304. This trend of revenue exceeding expenses is consistent across recent years, allowing for significant asset accumulation, crucial for a land conservation trust.
The organization's spending efficiency appears robust, with expenses consistently well below revenue, suggesting effective management of resources. A notable aspect of its financial operations is the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which speaks to a high level of volunteerism or very modest compensation structures, further enhancing its efficiency and donor confidence. The transparency is excellent, with 15 filings available, providing a comprehensive historical view of its financial activities.
Overall, Great Pond Mountain Conservation Trust appears to be a well-managed and financially sound organization. Its consistent asset growth, low expense ratios relative to revenue, and lack of reported officer compensation highlight a strong dedication to its conservation mission and efficient use of funds. The organization's financial trajectory suggests a sustainable model for long-term impact.