Strong financial health with substantial assets ($159,075,520 latest reported)
Spending Breakdown
How Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation
Is Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation (EIN: 208033091) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $122.1M. Assets: $159.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation is 208033091. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation spend its money?
Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 208033091 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Griffith R Harsh Iv And Margaret Cwhitman Charitable Foundation demonstrates consistent financial health, with assets growing from $80,157,393 in 2011 to $156,123,981 in 2023. The foundation consistently spends less than its revenue, indicating sound financial management and a growing endowment. For example, in 2023, revenue was $11,122,350 against expenses of $9,704,189. This pattern of revenue exceeding expenses is observed across most years, contributing to its substantial asset base.
The organization's spending efficiency is notable given that officer compensation has consistently been reported as 0% across all available filings. This suggests that the foundation's leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation on the 990, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited. The NTEE code T20 indicates a grantmaking foundation, implying that most expenses would be program-related grants.
Transparency appears strong in terms of financial reporting, with a consistent filing history over ten periods. The absence of officer compensation is a significant transparency point. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns beyond total expenses in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising. Further detail on the nature of their grantmaking activities would enhance overall transparency.