Minimal liabilities reported, indicating sound financial management of debts.
Spending Breakdown
How Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc
Is Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc (EIN: 136145558) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc a good charity to donate to?
Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $17K. Assets: $98K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc is 136145558. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc spend its money?
Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 136145558 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Harry And Jean Bunderoff Fund Inc. appears to be a small private foundation, as indicated by its consistent revenue and expense patterns over the past decade. The organization's assets have steadily declined from $166,785 in 2011 to $99,997 in 2023, while expenses have frequently exceeded revenue, suggesting it is drawing down its principal to fund its activities. For example, in 2023, revenue was $2,471 against expenses of $4,998. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding executive pay. However, without detailed program spending breakdowns, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the top-line figures. The consistent reporting of minimal liabilities ($0-$305) indicates good financial management in that regard.
The organization's financial health shows a clear trend of asset depletion. While this isn't inherently negative for a foundation designed to disburse funds, the rate of decline suggests a finite operational lifespan if current trends continue without significant new contributions. Transparency is generally good given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990, and the absence of officer compensation is a strong point. However, the lack of detailed program spending information in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of where funds are ultimately directed and how efficiently they are used to achieve the organization's mission.