Is Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care Legit?
Quick charity verification for Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care (EIN: 208338014)
Verdict: Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$53KRevenue
$35KAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent decline in assets from $83,627 in 2018 to $25,385 in 2023.
Expenses frequently exceeding revenue in recent years (e.g., $40,867 expenses vs. $36,884 revenue in 2023).
Strengths
Consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating no debt.
0% officer compensation across all filings, maximizing funds for mission.
Long history of IRS 990 filings, demonstrating transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care
Is Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care (EIN: 208338014) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care a good charity to donate to?
Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $53K. Assets: $35K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care is 208338014. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care spend its money?
Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care's tax-exempt status using EIN 208338014 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Hawaii Association For Wound Ostomy And Continence Care operates as a relatively small nonprofit with fluctuating but generally stable financial activity. Over the past five years, its revenue has ranged from a low of $2,336 in 2020 to a high of $43,450 in 2019, with the latest reported revenue at $36,884 in 2023. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating a healthy balance sheet and no outstanding debt, which is a strong positive for financial stability. However, its assets have seen a significant decline from a peak of $83,627 in 2018 to $25,385 in 2023, suggesting a draw-down on reserves or reduced accumulation of funds.
Spending efficiency appears to be reasonable given the organization's size and mission. While specific program spending percentages are not detailed in the provided data, the consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all filings indicates that leadership is likely volunteer-based, which maximizes funds available for programs and operations. The organization's expenses have often exceeded its revenue in recent years (e.g., $40,867 expenses vs. $36,884 revenue in 2023), leading to a reduction in assets. This trend, if continued, could impact long-term sustainability.
In terms of transparency, the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over a long period (10 filings provided) demonstrates a commitment to public disclosure. The absence of officer compensation is a key transparency indicator, showing that the organization is not using donor funds for executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a full assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The organization's small scale likely means administrative and fundraising costs are inherently lower.