No reported officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds regarding executive salaries.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history demonstrates good transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Hazel Dell Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hazel Dell Foundation
Is Hazel Dell Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hazel Dell Foundation (EIN: 136161744) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Hazel Dell Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Hazel Dell Foundation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $62K. Assets: $1.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hazel Dell Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hazel Dell Foundation is 136161744. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hazel Dell Foundation spend its money?
Hazel Dell Foundation allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hazel Dell Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hazel Dell Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 136161744 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Hazel Dell Foundation appears to be a grant-making organization, as indicated by its NTEE code T22 (Private Grantmaking Foundations). Its financial health shows a consistent pattern of expenses exceeding revenue in recent years. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $53,725 while expenses were $123,019, resulting in a deficit. This trend is observed across all recent filings, suggesting the organization is drawing down its assets to cover operational costs or grant disbursements. Despite these deficits, the organization maintains substantial assets, reported at $1,414,529 in 2023, which provides a buffer. However, the consistent negative operating margin is a concern for long-term sustainability if not addressed by increased revenue or reduced spending.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses, it's challenging to precisely determine program versus administrative costs. However, the consistent deficits suggest that the organization's current operational model is not self-sustaining through its revenue streams alone. The absence of officer compensation across all reported periods indicates a lean executive structure, which is a positive sign for minimizing administrative overhead related to salaries. The organization's transparency is generally good, with consistent annual filings available, but more detailed expense breakdowns would enhance understanding of its spending efficiency.
Overall, while the foundation has significant assets and no reported officer compensation, its ongoing operational deficits, where expenses are consistently double its revenue, warrant closer examination. This pattern suggests a reliance on its endowment rather than generating sufficient annual income to cover its activities. While this can be a valid strategy for foundations, the magnitude of the deficit relative to revenue is notable.