How Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
7%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
3%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc
Is Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc (EIN: 10826156) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 92/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc a good charity to donate to?
Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc has a Mission Score of 92/100. Revenue: $3.1M. Assets: $1.6M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc is 10826156. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc spend its money?
Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc allocates 90% to programs, 7% to administration, and 3% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 10826156 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Health Improvement Partnership Of Santa Cruz County Inc demonstrates a generally stable financial position, with assets growing from $398,143 in 2015 to $925,131 in 2023. The organization has experienced fluctuations in revenue and expenses, with recent periods showing expenses exceeding revenue, such as in 2023 ($1,881,721 expenses vs. $1,766,832 revenue) and 2022 ($2,007,650 expenses vs. $1,644,004 revenue). This trend of operating deficits in recent years warrants attention, though the organization maintains a healthy asset base relative to its liabilities.
Spending efficiency appears to be strong, particularly given the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, indicating that executive leadership is not drawing salaries from the organization. This suggests a high dedication of resources towards programmatic activities rather than administrative overhead. The organization's transparency is commendable through its consistent filing of IRS Form 990s, providing a clear historical financial record.
While the recent operating deficits are a point to monitor, the overall financial health is supported by growing assets and a very lean executive compensation structure. The organization's ability to manage these deficits while maintaining its mission will be key to its long-term sustainability.