Quick charity verification for Hear To See (EIN: 203495291)
Verdict: Hear To See appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$120Revenue
$4KAssets
0Red Flags
4Strengths
No red flags identified.
Strengths
Zero executive compensation reported across all filings, indicating a volunteer-driven model.
Consistent financial stability with zero liabilities reported over 13 years.
Maintains a small annual surplus (e.g., $45 in 2023: $120 revenue - $75 expenses), demonstrating fiscal prudence.
Steady, albeit slow, growth in assets from $4,062 in 2014 to $4,257 in 2023.
Spending Breakdown
How Hear To See allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hear To See
Is Hear To See a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hear To See (EIN: 203495291) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Hear To See a good charity to donate to?
Hear To See has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $120. Assets: $4K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hear To See?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hear To See is 203495291. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hear To See spend its money?
Hear To See allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hear To See's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hear To See's tax-exempt status using EIN 203495291 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Hear To See appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on its consistent minimal revenue and expenses, and zero reported officer compensation across all available filings. With annual revenues consistently around $120 and expenses around $75 in recent years, the organization operates on a micro-budget. Its assets have shown slow, steady growth from $4,062 in 2014 to $4,257 in 2023, indicating careful management of its limited resources. The consistent reporting of zero liabilities further suggests a financially stable, albeit small, operation.
The organization's financial health is stable given its scale, consistently generating a small surplus (e.g., $120 revenue vs. $75 expenses in 2023). Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of the $75 in expenses, but the absence of officer compensation implies that all funds are directed towards its mission. Transparency is high regarding executive compensation, as none is reported, aligning with a volunteer model. However, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of spending efficiency.