Significant decline in revenue (from $1,755 to $171) between 2014 and 2015
Declining assets (from $2,480 to $1,740) between 2014 and 2015
Extremely low financial activity, potentially limiting program impact
Strengths
100% volunteer-run with 0% officer compensation in both reported periods
No liabilities reported in either period, indicating financial prudence
Transparent with IRS 990 filings available
Spending Breakdown
How Heartland Hams Incorporated allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Heartland Hams Incorporated
Is Heartland Hams Incorporated a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Heartland Hams Incorporated (EIN: 205135191) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Heartland Hams Incorporated a good charity to donate to?
Heartland Hams Incorporated has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Heartland Hams Incorporated?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Heartland Hams Incorporated is 205135191. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Heartland Hams Incorporated spend its money?
Heartland Hams Incorporated allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Heartland Hams Incorporated's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Heartland Hams Incorporated's tax-exempt status using EIN 205135191 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Heartland Hams Incorporated appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization, as indicated by its minimal revenue and assets, and 0% officer compensation in both reported periods. The organization's financial health shows a decline, with revenue dropping from $1,755 in 2014 to $171 in 2015, and assets decreasing from $2,480 to $1,740 over the same period. Expenses also decreased, from $1,408 to $911, suggesting an attempt to scale back operations in line with reduced income. Given the extremely low financial activity, assessing spending efficiency in traditional terms is challenging, but the lack of paid officers suggests a high degree of volunteer effort. The organization's transparency is good, with filings available, and the absence of officer compensation indicates that all funds are directed towards the organization's activities rather than executive salaries.