Is Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 Legit?

Quick charity verification for Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 (EIN: 207196198)

Verdict: Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$59KRevenue
$1.2MAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3

Is Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 (EIN: 207196198) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 a good charity to donate to?

Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $59K. Assets: $1.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 is 207196198. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 spend its money?

Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3's tax-exempt status using EIN 207196198 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Henry W Buresh Tr Paragraph 3 appears to be a grant-making organization, given its consistent revenue and asset levels, and the absence of officer compensation. The organization consistently spends more than its annual revenue, drawing down its assets over time. For example, in the 202408 period, revenue was $55,713 while expenses were $154,656, leading to a significant deficit. This trend is visible across multiple years, indicating a strategy of distributing more than it earns annually, likely from its endowment. While the organization's financial health is stable in terms of assets, the consistent deficit spending suggests a planned depletion of capital or a reliance on investment returns that are not fully covering distributions. The lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator of efficiency, as is the minimal liability. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising), it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The organization's transparency could be improved by providing more granular expense details in its public filings. Overall, the organization seems to be fulfilling its purpose by distributing funds, but the long-term sustainability of its current spending model, given the declining asset base from $1,714,682 in 2011 to $1,389,725 in 2024, warrants closer observation. The consistent liabilities of $1 in recent years are unusual and might indicate a minor accounting practice rather than a significant financial obligation.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages