No reported officer compensation, indicating low direct leadership overhead.
Long operating history with 10 filings, suggesting established presence and experience.
Spending Breakdown
How Heritage Home For Women allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Heritage Home For Women
Is Heritage Home For Women a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Heritage Home For Women (EIN: 141364573) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Heritage Home For Women a good charity to donate to?
Heritage Home For Women has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $8.0M. Assets: $15.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Heritage Home For Women?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Heritage Home For Women is 141364573. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Heritage Home For Women spend its money?
Heritage Home For Women allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Heritage Home For Women's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Heritage Home For Women's tax-exempt status using EIN 141364573 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Heritage Home For Women demonstrates a consistent pattern of operating at a deficit, with expenses frequently exceeding revenue. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $2,148,317 against revenues of $1,774,637, and in 2022, expenses were $2,023,878 against revenues of $411,378. This trend suggests a reliance on drawing down assets or other funding sources to cover operational costs, as total assets have remained relatively stable, fluctuating between $13 million and $18 million over the past decade. The organization's liabilities have also shown some fluctuation, with a notable increase in recent years compared to earlier filings.
The organization's financial health appears stable in terms of asset base, but the recurring operational deficits warrant closer examination. While the provided data does not detail the breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising, the consistent negative net income indicates that the organization is not self-sustaining through its annual revenue streams. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a volunteer-led executive team or that compensation is reported under other expense categories, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs.
Overall, Heritage Home For Women maintains a substantial asset base, but its operational model consistently spends more than it earns. Further transparency on expense allocation would be beneficial to fully assess spending efficiency. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive indicator for minimizing overhead in that specific area, but the overall financial sustainability relies on its significant asset reserves.