0% officer compensation reported across all filings, indicating low executive overhead.
Maintains a healthy asset-to-liability ratio, with assets significantly exceeding liabilities (e.g., $86,445 assets vs. $4,141 liabilities in 2023).
Spending Breakdown
How Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr
Is Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr (EIN: 206239287) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr a good charity to donate to?
Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $44K. Assets: $84K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr is 206239287. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr spend its money?
Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr's tax-exempt status using EIN 206239287 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr appears to be a very small organization with limited financial activity. Over the past decade, its revenue has consistently been low, ranging from $1,706 to $3,906 annually, while expenses have generally exceeded revenue, leading to a gradual decline in assets from $133,120 in 2011 to $86,445 in 2023. This indicates that the organization is spending more than it brings in each year, drawing down its reserves. Given the minimal financial scale, the organization's financial health is stable in terms of having assets to cover liabilities, but its operational model relies on existing capital rather than self-sustaining revenue generation.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the consistent deficit spending suggests that the organization's current operational costs are not fully covered by its fundraising efforts. However, the absence of officer compensation reported across all filings indicates that administrative costs related to executive salaries are non-existent, which is a positive sign for efficiency in that specific area. The organization's transparency is good in terms of filing its IRS 990s consistently, which allows for public scrutiny of its high-level financial data.
Overall, Hilda Long Animal Protection Tr operates on a very modest budget, consistently spending more than it earns. While it maintains a healthy asset-to-liability ratio, its long-term financial sustainability depends on either increasing revenue or reducing expenses to avoid further depletion of its asset base. The lack of executive compensation is a notable strength in terms of minimizing administrative overhead.