Historically maintained assets, though this trend has reversed in the latest filing.
Spending Breakdown
How Holden Land Trust allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Holden Land Trust
Is Holden Land Trust a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Holden Land Trust (EIN: 161719924) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Holden Land Trust a good charity to donate to?
Holden Land Trust has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Holden Land Trust?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Holden Land Trust is 161719924. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Holden Land Trust spend its money?
Holden Land Trust allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Holden Land Trust's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Holden Land Trust's tax-exempt status using EIN 161719924 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Holden Land Trust appears to be a small, community-focused organization with fluctuating financial activity. The most recent filing (202012) shows negative revenue of $-127,943, which is a significant concern, especially when coupled with zero assets. This suggests potential financial instability or a reporting anomaly that warrants further investigation. Prior years show modest revenues and expenses, with assets declining steadily from $344,962 in 2017 to $148,737 in 2020. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-driven or very lean operational structure, which can be a positive for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead.
The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency, but the low overall expenses in most years suggest a focus on direct program activities given its land trust mission. However, the sudden drop to zero assets and negative revenue in the latest period is a major red flag for financial health. Transparency is generally good regarding officer compensation, but the overall financial picture from the latest filing is concerning and lacks clarity without more context.