Is Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny Legit?
Quick charity verification for Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny (EIN: 131884785)
Verdict: Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$8.4MRevenue
$34.1MAssets
4Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operational deficits, with expenses exceeding revenue in most reported periods.
Declining revenue trend, from over $5 million in 2014 to $2 million in 2023.
Significant increase in liabilities, from under $400,000 in 2018 to over $29 million in 2023, indicating a substantial shift in financial structure or debt burden.
Overall decline in total assets over the past decade.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, indicating a highly efficient use of funds at the leadership level.
Long operational history with 13 filings, suggesting established presence and experience in its mission.
Substantial asset base of over $33 million, providing a foundation for operations despite liabilities.
Spending Breakdown
How Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny
Is Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny (EIN: 131884785) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny a good charity to donate to?
Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $8.4M. Assets: $34.1M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny is 131884785. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny spend its money?
Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Home For The Aged Of The Little Sis Ters Of The Poor Of The City Of Ny's tax-exempt status using EIN 131884785 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Home For The Aged Of The Little Sisters Of The Poor Of The City Of NY demonstrates a consistent operational deficit over the past several years, with expenses regularly exceeding revenue. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $2,558,884 against revenues of $2,047,436, and this trend is visible across most recent filings. While the organization maintains substantial assets, reported at $33,685,532 in 2023, a significant portion of these are offset by liabilities, which stood at $29,262,008 in the same year. This suggests a reliance on debt or restricted funds rather than robust unrestricted reserves.
The organization's financial health shows a declining trend in both revenue and assets over the past decade. Revenue has fallen from $5,020,234 in 2014 to $2,047,436 in 2023, and assets have decreased from $39,892,417 to $33,685,532 over the same period. The consistent operational losses, coupled with declining financial resources, indicate a need for strategic financial planning to ensure long-term sustainability. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or religiously compensated leadership structure, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency, though further detail on compensation for key employees would provide a more complete picture of spending efficiency.