Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential dormancy or cessation of operations.
Consistent deficit spending in two out of three reported periods (e.g., $7,141 deficit in 2012), raising sustainability concerns.
Very low and declining asset base, from $11,181 in 2010 to $0 in the latest filing.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, suggesting a volunteer-driven model and efficient use of funds for leadership.
No reported liabilities across all filings, indicating a debt-free status.
Spending Breakdown
How Hoonah Baptist Mission allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hoonah Baptist Mission
Is Hoonah Baptist Mission a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hoonah Baptist Mission (EIN: 205897288) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Hoonah Baptist Mission a good charity to donate to?
Hoonah Baptist Mission has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hoonah Baptist Mission?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hoonah Baptist Mission is 205897288. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hoonah Baptist Mission spend its money?
Hoonah Baptist Mission allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hoonah Baptist Mission's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hoonah Baptist Mission's tax-exempt status using EIN 205897288 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Hoonah Baptist Mission appears to be a very small, community-focused organization, as indicated by its modest financial activity. The organization consistently reported low revenue and expenses, with the latest filing showing $0 in both, suggesting a period of dormancy or minimal activity. While the organization has maintained positive assets, albeit small, it has also frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses exceeding revenue in two out of three reported periods (e.g., $25,951 expenses vs. $18,810 revenue in 2012). This pattern of deficit spending, coupled with the current $0 revenue and assets, raises questions about its ongoing operational capacity and financial sustainability. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-driven model, which can be a strength for small organizations, but also means there's no executive compensation to analyze for efficiency.