Minimal liabilities reported across all filings ($1 in most recent years).
Spending Breakdown
How Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary
Is Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary (EIN: 10458230) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 55/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary a good charity to donate to?
Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary has a Mission Score of 55/100. Revenue: $17K. Assets: $699K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary is 10458230. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary spend its money?
Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary's tax-exempt status using EIN 10458230 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Housel Ryan Sheldon Wildlife Sanctuary demonstrates a high degree of transparency, consistently filing its IRS Form 990s with no reported officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-led or very lean operational structure. The organization's financial health, however, shows a concerning trend of declining assets and consistent operating deficits. For instance, in 2023, revenue was only $335 against expenses of $27,276, and assets decreased from $749,803 in 2022 to $723,031. This pattern of expenses significantly exceeding revenue has been consistent across most recent filings, leading to a steady draw-down on its asset base, which has fallen from $970,953 in 2012 to $698,702 currently. While the organization maintains minimal liabilities, the long-term sustainability of its operations is questionable without a substantial increase in revenue or a significant reduction in expenses.
The spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, which is not provided in the summary data. However, given the consistent operating deficits and the decline in assets, the current operational model is not financially efficient or sustainable. The lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator of resource allocation towards the mission, but it doesn't offset the overall financial imbalance. The organization's transparency is commendable through its consistent filings and clear reporting of zero officer compensation, but the financial trends warrant closer scrutiny regarding its long-term viability and impact.