Long filing history (10 filings) demonstrates consistent compliance with IRS reporting requirements.
Spending Breakdown
How Hudson Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hudson Foundation
Is Hudson Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hudson Foundation (EIN: 10482817) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Hudson Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Hudson Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $1.2M. Assets: $5.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hudson Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hudson Foundation is 10482817. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hudson Foundation spend its money?
Hudson Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hudson Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hudson Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 10482817 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Hudson Foundation exhibits a mixed financial picture based on its IRS 990 filings. While the organization maintains substantial assets, reaching $5,167,747 in its latest filing, its revenue has been highly volatile, including a significant negative revenue of $-27,617 in 2023 and a peak of $1,830,249 in 2021. This inconsistency in funding could pose challenges for long-term program planning and stability. The organization consistently reports minimal liabilities ($1 across all filings), indicating a strong balance sheet in terms of debt.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed functional expense breakdown, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all periods suggests a lean operational structure at the executive level, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence. The NTEE code T20J (Private Grantmaking Foundations) implies that a significant portion of expenses should ideally be in grants or program-related investments.
Transparency appears to be adequate given the availability of 10 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of $1 in liabilities across all periods, while potentially a simplification, does not inherently raise a red flag for transparency but rather suggests a very conservative or specific accounting practice for liabilities. The lack of officer compensation is a strong point for transparency regarding executive pay.