Quick charity verification for Human Rights First (EIN: 133116646)
Verdict: Human Rights First appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$14.0MRevenue
$8.9MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Expenses exceeded revenue in 2022 ($15.9M vs $14.4M) and 2023 ($15.0M vs $14.7M), indicating recent operating deficits.
The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation is unusual for an organization of this scale and could indicate compensation being reported in other categories, potentially obscuring a full picture of executive pay.
Strengths
Strong and growing asset base, reaching $16.8 million in 2023, providing financial stability.
Consistent revenue generation, typically in the $12-16 million range, indicating stable donor support.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (14 periods), demonstrating transparency and accountability.
Zero reported officer compensation across all filings, suggesting a highly efficient use of funds at the executive level or a volunteer leadership model.
Spending Breakdown
How Human Rights First allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Human Rights First
Is Human Rights First a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Human Rights First (EIN: 133116646) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Human Rights First a good charity to donate to?
Human Rights First has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $14.0M. Assets: $8.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Human Rights First?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Human Rights First is 133116646. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Human Rights First spend its money?
Human Rights First allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Human Rights First's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Human Rights First's tax-exempt status using EIN 133116646 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Human Rights First demonstrates a generally stable financial position, with revenues consistently in the $12-16 million range over the past five years, peaking at $16.5 million in 2018. The organization has maintained healthy asset levels, reaching $16.8 million in 2023, significantly exceeding its liabilities of $4.2 million in the same period. This indicates a strong balance sheet and capacity to cover short-term obligations. However, recent years (2022 and 2023) show expenses slightly exceeding revenue, with expenses of $15.9 million against $14.4 million revenue in 2022, and $15.0 million against $14.7 million revenue in 2023. While not immediately alarming, a sustained trend of deficit spending could impact long-term financial health if not addressed.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed functional expense breakdown, it's challenging to precisely assess program versus administrative costs. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing top-heavy executive costs, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence and efficient use of funds. The organization's NTEE code (Q700 - Human Rights) aligns with its mission, and its consistent revenue generation suggests strong donor support for its programs. The significant increase in assets from $3.9 million in 2017 to $16.8 million in 2023 also points to effective financial management and growth.
Transparency appears strong given the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 14 periods, providing a comprehensive historical financial record. The readily available data allows for a clear understanding of revenue, expenses, and asset trends. The absence of reported officer compensation is a notable transparency point, indicating either a volunteer leadership structure or compensation being reported under other expense categories, which would warrant further investigation for full clarity.