Quick charity verification for Hungerless Arkansas (EIN: 200220633)
Verdict: Hungerless Arkansas has notable concerns
10/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating likely cessation of operations.
Expenses ($38,337) exceeded revenue ($26,409) in the 201309 period, suggesting financial instability prior to becoming inactive.
Strengths
Reported 0% officer compensation in active periods (201209 and 201309), indicating no executive salaries were paid.
Spending Breakdown
How Hungerless Arkansas allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Hungerless Arkansas
Is Hungerless Arkansas a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Hungerless Arkansas (EIN: 200220633) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 10/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Hungerless Arkansas a good charity to donate to?
Hungerless Arkansas has a Mission Score of 10/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Hungerless Arkansas?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Hungerless Arkansas is 200220633. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Hungerless Arkansas spend its money?
Hungerless Arkansas allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Hungerless Arkansas's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Hungerless Arkansas's tax-exempt status using EIN 200220633 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Hungerless Arkansas appears to be a very small, likely defunct, organization based on its latest filing showing $0 in revenue and assets. In its last active filing period (201309), it reported $26,409 in revenue against $38,337 in expenses, indicating it spent more than it brought in. The prior period (201209) showed $44,519 in revenue and $32,014 in expenses, suggesting a more stable financial position at that time. The significant drop to zero revenue and assets in its latest filing raises serious concerns about its operational status and financial viability. The organization has consistently reported 0% officer compensation, which is a positive sign for resource allocation when it was active. However, the lack of recent financial activity makes a current assessment of spending efficiency and transparency impossible beyond noting its apparent cessation of operations.