Is Indonesian Partnership Legit?

Quick charity verification for Indonesian Partnership (EIN: 202123639)

Verdict: Indonesian Partnership shows mixed signals

60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Indonesian Partnership allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Indonesian Partnership

Is Indonesian Partnership a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Indonesian Partnership (EIN: 202123639) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Indonesian Partnership a good charity to donate to?

Indonesian Partnership has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Indonesian Partnership?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Indonesian Partnership is 202123639. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Indonesian Partnership spend its money?

Indonesian Partnership allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Indonesian Partnership's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Indonesian Partnership's tax-exempt status using EIN 202123639 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Indonesian Partnership appears to be a very small organization, with its latest filing showing $0 in revenue and assets, suggesting it may no longer be actively operating or has significantly scaled down. Historically, its financial health has been modest, with revenues fluctuating between approximately $35,000 and $77,000 annually. The organization consistently spent more than it brought in during several periods, such as 2016 ($40,452 expenses vs. $35,288 revenue) and 2012 ($90,141 expenses vs. $77,603 revenue), leading to a depletion of assets over time. While specific spending breakdowns are not available in the provided data, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation indicates a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead at the executive level, which is a positive sign for spending efficiency. The lack of liabilities across all reported periods also suggests a fiscally responsible approach to debt management. However, the current $0 revenue and assets raise significant concerns about its ongoing viability and impact.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages