Is Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc Legit?
Quick charity verification for Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc (EIN: 201381912)
Verdict: Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$3.9MRevenue
$281KAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Historically high liabilities relative to assets in several periods, indicating potential financial instability or reliance on current funding.
Consistent 0% officer compensation reported, which is unusual for an organization of this size and could mask executive benefits reported elsewhere.
Strengths
Significant revenue growth in recent years, from $811,588 in 2021 to $2,212,690 in 2023, indicating increased support.
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, demonstrating a commitment to directing funds to the mission.
Positive net income in the latest filing period (2023), with revenue of $2,212,690 exceeding expenses of $1,873,452.
Spending Breakdown
How Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc
Is Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc (EIN: 201381912) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc a good charity to donate to?
Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $3.9M. Assets: $281K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc is 201381912. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc spend its money?
Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 201381912 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Institute For The Study Of Global Anti Semitism And Policy Inc (ISGAP) demonstrates a fluctuating financial trajectory, with significant revenue growth in recent years, culminating in $2,212,690 in 2023. This growth is positive, but the organization has historically operated with liabilities often exceeding assets, indicating a reliance on current funding rather than substantial reserves. For instance, in 2022, assets were only $31,630 against liabilities of $287,066.
Spending efficiency appears reasonable, with expenses generally aligning with or slightly below revenue in recent periods, suggesting a move towards financial stability after several years of operating deficits. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings is a strong indicator of transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards the mission rather than executive salaries. This practice is highly commendable and contributes positively to their overall financial health assessment.
However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited. The organization's transparency in executive compensation is excellent, but further detail on functional expenses would enhance a complete understanding of how funds are allocated.