Is International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron Legit?
Quick charity verification for International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron (EIN: 141512728)
Verdict: International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$9.4MRevenue
$10.4MAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Significant decline in revenue over the past decade, from $3.3M in 2014 to $1.7M in 2023, without clear explanation.
Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown in the provided summary data, limiting full spending efficiency analysis.
Strengths
Consistent growth in net assets, from $6.5M in 2014 to $9.7M in 2023, indicating financial stability.
Reported 0% officer compensation across all filings, demonstrating a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead at the executive level.
Maintained positive net income in most years, with revenue exceeding expenses, contributing to asset accumulation.
Spending Breakdown
How International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron
Is International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron (EIN: 141512728) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron a good charity to donate to?
International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $9.4M. Assets: $10.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron is 141512728. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron spend its money?
International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron's tax-exempt status?
You can verify International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron's tax-exempt status using EIN 141512728 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The International Association Of Bridge Structural & Ornamental Iron appears to be in a stable financial position, consistently maintaining positive net assets over the past decade, growing from $6,532,530 in 2014 to $9,748,858 in 2023. The organization's revenue and expenses have fluctuated, with a notable decrease in revenue from $3,312,379 in 2014 to $1,742,360 in 2023, and a corresponding decrease in expenses. This trend suggests a potential scaling down of operations or a shift in funding sources.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent positive difference between revenue and expenses in most years indicates responsible financial management. For instance, in 2023, revenue of $1,742,360 exceeded expenses of $1,330,794, contributing to asset growth.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with 0% officer compensation reported across all available filings. This indicates that the organization's leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not classified as officer compensation, which is a strong positive for donor confidence. However, the lack of detailed functional expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a complete assessment of spending transparency.