Is International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction Legit?

Quick charity verification for International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction (EIN: 136175722)

Verdict: International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score

$2.5MRevenue

$8.4MAssets

2Red Flags

3Strengths

Red Flags

Significant year-over-year financial volatility, with large swings between surpluses and deficits (e.g., $7.4M surplus in 2023 after $3.1M deficit in 2022).
Inconsistent revenue streams, as evidenced by the wide range of annual revenues from $2.7M to $11.4M over the last three years.

Strengths

Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating strong fiscal responsibility in executive pay.
Substantial growth in assets, from $5.8 million in 2014 to $15.0 million in 2023, providing a strong financial base.
Demonstrated ability to generate significant revenue, as seen in the $11.4 million revenue in 2023.

Spending Breakdown

How International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction

Is International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction (EIN: 136175722) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction a good charity to donate to?

International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $2.5M. Assets: $8.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction is 136175722. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction spend its money?

International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction's tax-exempt status?

You can verify International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction's tax-exempt status using EIN 136175722 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The International Institute Of Rural Reconstruction demonstrates fluctuating financial health over the past decade. While the organization reported a significant surplus in 2023 with revenue of $11,421,611 against expenses of $3,960,147, it has also experienced periods of substantial deficits, such as in 2022 where expenses of $5,924,695 far exceeded revenue of $2,742,979. This volatility in revenue and expenses suggests potential challenges in consistent financial planning or reliance on large, infrequent grants. The organization's assets have grown considerably, from $5,851,458 in 2014 to $15,090,019 in 2023, indicating a strong asset base, though liabilities have also seen increases, reaching $2,074,177 in 2023.

Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data. However, the absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a positive indicator for transparency and potentially lower administrative overhead in that specific area. The significant swings between large surpluses and deficits, particularly the $7.4 million surplus in 2023 following a $3.1 million deficit in 2022, warrant closer examination to understand the underlying causes and the sustainability of their financial model.

Overall, the organization appears to be transparent regarding executive compensation, reporting 0% for officer compensation in all available periods. However, the lack of detailed expense categorization (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in the provided summary limits a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency. The substantial growth in assets is a strength, but the inconsistent revenue and expense patterns suggest a need for more stable financial management or clearer communication regarding funding cycles.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.