Low liabilities relative to assets, suggesting strong financial health.
Spending Breakdown
How International Law Association American Branch allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about International Law Association American Branch
Is International Law Association American Branch a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, International Law Association American Branch (EIN: 136167151) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is International Law Association American Branch a good charity to donate to?
International Law Association American Branch has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for International Law Association American Branch?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for International Law Association American Branch is 136167151. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does International Law Association American Branch spend its money?
International Law Association American Branch allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify International Law Association American Branch's tax-exempt status?
You can verify International Law Association American Branch's tax-exempt status using EIN 136167151 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The International Law Association American Branch appears to be in a stable financial position, consistently maintaining positive net assets over the past five years, growing from $266,173 in 2011 to $494,868 in 2015. The organization's revenue has fluctuated, peaking at $188,572 in 2014, but has generally exceeded expenses, allowing for asset growth. Their financial health seems robust given their consistent asset accumulation and low liabilities.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, as the provided data only includes total expenses. However, the organization consistently spends less than it brings in, indicating responsible financial management. For example, in 2015, they had revenues of $82,171 against expenses of $38,051, suggesting a significant portion of revenue was retained or allocated to future activities.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is high, as officer compensation has been reported as 0% across all available filings. However, without a detailed functional expense breakdown (program, administrative, fundraising), a complete picture of spending efficiency and programmatic focus is not fully available from the provided data. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s demonstrates a commitment to regulatory transparency.