Generally operates near break-even, demonstrating fiscal responsibility
Maintains positive net assets in most recent years
Consistent filing of IRS 990 forms, indicating compliance and transparency
Spending Breakdown
How International Union Uaw allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about International Union Uaw
Is International Union Uaw a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, International Union Uaw (EIN: 10959193) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is International Union Uaw a good charity to donate to?
International Union Uaw has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $484K. Assets: $118K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for International Union Uaw?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for International Union Uaw is 10959193. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does International Union Uaw spend its money?
International Union Uaw allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify International Union Uaw's tax-exempt status?
You can verify International Union Uaw's tax-exempt status using EIN 10959193 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
International Union Uaw demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally in close proximity, indicating a lean operational model. For example, in 2023, revenue was $508,532 against expenses of $504,374. The organization has maintained positive net assets in most recent years, though the asset base remains relatively modest compared to its annual revenue, such as $85,089 in assets against over $500,000 in revenue in 2023. This suggests a focus on immediate operational spending rather than significant asset accumulation.
The organization's spending efficiency appears to be reasonable, with expenses closely tracking revenue. However, without a detailed breakdown of program service expenses versus administrative and fundraising costs, it's challenging to fully assess efficiency. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings is a significant positive indicator of financial transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards the organization's mission rather than executive salaries. This practice enhances trust and suggests a volunteer-driven or very low-overhead leadership structure.
Overall, the financial health appears stable, with the organization generally operating within its means. The lack of reported officer compensation is a strong point for transparency. However, the absence of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of spending efficiency and program impact. Further transparency on how expenses are categorized would provide a clearer picture of where funds are ultimately directed.