Consistent asset growth, from $4,045,982 in 2014 to $6,122,868 in 2023.
Expenses consistently below revenue in most recent years, indicating sound financial management.
0% reported officer compensation across all filings, suggesting high resource allocation to mission.
Healthy revenue growth, with latest reported revenue at $2,068,866.
Spending Breakdown
How James Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about James Foundation
Is James Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, James Foundation (EIN: 131614951) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 88/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is James Foundation a good charity to donate to?
James Foundation has a Mission Score of 88/100. Revenue: $2.1M. Assets: $6.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for James Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for James Foundation is 131614951. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does James Foundation spend its money?
James Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify James Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify James Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 131614951 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The James Foundation demonstrates consistent financial stability and growth over the past decade. With latest reported revenue of $2,068,866 and assets of $6,539,842, the organization has shown a healthy increase in its financial capacity. Its expenses have generally been well below its revenue, leading to asset accumulation, as seen by the growth from $4,045,982 in 2014 to $6,122,868 in 2023. This indicates sound financial management and an ability to build reserves.
The organization's spending efficiency appears strong, as evidenced by the consistent positive difference between revenue and expenses in most recent years (e.g., $1,651,051 revenue vs. $1,415,116 expenses in 2023). A notable aspect of its transparency is the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, suggesting that executive leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to mission. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited.
Overall, the James Foundation appears to be a financially healthy organization with a growing asset base and a history of managing expenses effectively. The lack of reported officer compensation is a significant point for transparency, though further detail on functional expenses would enhance the understanding of its operational efficiency and program focus.