How Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc
Is Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc (EIN: 136066102) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc a good charity to donate to?
Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $1.8M. Assets: $4.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc is 136066102. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc spend its money?
Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 136066102 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Jim Neuberger And Helen Stambler Neuberger Foundation Inc demonstrates consistent financial health with growing assets over the past several years, reaching $4,920,569 in 2023. The organization consistently spends less than its revenue, as seen in 2023 where revenue was $366,298 and expenses were $304,203, indicating sound financial management and an ability to build reserves. The foundation's liabilities have consistently been minimal ($1 in recent years), suggesting a very low debt burden and strong financial stability. The absence of officer compensation reported across all filings indicates a lean operational structure, likely relying on volunteer efforts or external management, which can contribute to higher spending efficiency on programs.
While specific program spending details are not provided in the summary data, the overall expense levels relative to revenue suggest a focus on its mission. The foundation's transparency is good, with a consistent filing history of 10 IRS 990 forms. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive indicator for donor confidence, as it suggests resources are not being diverted to high executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The NTEE code being unknown also limits the ability to benchmark against similar organizations.