How John & Jane Powers Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about John & Jane Powers Foundation
Is John & Jane Powers Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, John & Jane Powers Foundation (EIN: 137104747) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is John & Jane Powers Foundation a good charity to donate to?
John & Jane Powers Foundation has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $6.7M. Assets: $9.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for John & Jane Powers Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for John & Jane Powers Foundation is 137104747. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does John & Jane Powers Foundation spend its money?
John & Jane Powers Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify John & Jane Powers Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify John & Jane Powers Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 137104747 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The John & Jane Powers Foundation, based in North Palm Beach, FL, appears to be a private foundation primarily focused on grantmaking, as indicated by its NTEE code T20Z. The foundation demonstrates strong financial health with latest reported assets of $9,922,762 and recent revenue growth, reaching $1,120,656 in 2023. A notable characteristic is its extremely low expense ratio relative to revenue in recent years; for instance, in 2023, expenses were $107,874 against $1,120,656 in revenue, suggesting a significant portion of revenue is retained or used for future grantmaking rather than immediate operational spending. This pattern is consistent across recent filings, where expenses consistently remain below $100,000 annually, even as revenue has surged. The foundation's transparency is good, with consistent annual filings available, and a clear indication of no officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor trust.
The spending efficiency, while appearing very low in terms of operational expenses, needs to be understood in the context of a grantmaking foundation. The low 'expenses' reported likely represent administrative costs, with the actual 'program spending' being the grants distributed, which are not explicitly detailed as expenses in the provided summary. Assuming the majority of the difference between revenue and reported expenses is allocated to grants or asset growth for future grants, the foundation is efficient in its administrative overhead. The consistent 'Liabilities=$1' across all filings is unusual but not necessarily a red flag for a private foundation, often indicating minimal operational debt. The absence of officer compensation further enhances its perceived efficiency and commitment to its mission.