Is Just Alternatives Legit?

Quick charity verification for Just Alternatives (EIN: 20656086)

Verdict: Just Alternatives appears trustworthy

75/100Mission Score
$26KRevenue
$27KAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Just Alternatives allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Just Alternatives

Is Just Alternatives a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Just Alternatives (EIN: 20656086) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Just Alternatives a good charity to donate to?

Just Alternatives has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $26K. Assets: $27K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Just Alternatives?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Just Alternatives is 20656086. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Just Alternatives spend its money?

Just Alternatives allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Just Alternatives's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Just Alternatives's tax-exempt status using EIN 20656086 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Just Alternatives, with a latest reported revenue of $26,315 and assets of $26,523, appears to be a small organization. Its financial health shows some volatility, with expenses exceeding revenue in several recent periods, such as 2023 ($26,122 expenses vs. $18,145 revenue) and 2019 ($26,327 expenses vs. $24,850 revenue). This suggests a reliance on prior reserves or fluctuating funding. However, the organization has maintained positive net assets over time, indicating a degree of financial stability despite these fluctuations. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean operational structure, which can be a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the absence of officer compensation implies a low administrative burden in terms of salaries. The organization's assets have fluctuated significantly, from a low of $1,031 in 2019 to a high of $61,363 in 2013, and currently stand at $26,523. This variability could reflect project-based funding or strategic asset management. Transparency appears to be good in terms of filing compliance, with 10 filings available. The consistent reporting of minimal liabilities ($1 in most recent filings) is also a positive sign. The lack of detailed expense breakdowns beyond total expenses, however, limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated between programs and overhead. Overall, the organization demonstrates basic financial transparency through its regular IRS filings and a commitment to minimizing executive costs.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages